<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More tracker thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brewsterware.com/more-tracker-thoughts.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brewsterware.com/more-tracker-thoughts.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Brewer</title>
		<link>http://www.brewsterware.com/more-tracker-thoughts.html/comment-page-1#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Brewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewsterware.com/?p=189#comment-957</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your interest.  Landing page rotation and offer rotation will soon be done.  I&#039;ll have to look at PPVD to see what you mean by using tokens.  Syncing of cost data with PPV networks is going to be tricky - need to blog about this to get an idea of what is possible and what people think of potential solutions.  Tracking of double conversions with one subid can be supported although no reports that I have written show double conversions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your interest.  Landing page rotation and offer rotation will soon be done.  I&#8217;ll have to look at PPVD to see what you mean by using tokens.  Syncing of cost data with PPV networks is going to be tricky &#8211; need to blog about this to get an idea of what is possible and what people think of potential solutions.  Tracking of double conversions with one subid can be supported although no reports that I have written show double conversions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Brewer</title>
		<link>http://www.brewsterware.com/more-tracker-thoughts.html/comment-page-1#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Brewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 14:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewsterware.com/?p=189#comment-956</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your interest.  I did put some thought into modifying prosper202, but I decided against it as I would have to familiarise myself with all of the code (and there is alot!) to see whether my ideas could be easily implemented.  Plus hacking other peoples code with mods may break the security - even though its a secure tracker does not mean it will stay that way if I mod it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your interest.  I did put some thought into modifying prosper202, but I decided against it as I would have to familiarise myself with all of the code (and there is alot!) to see whether my ideas could be easily implemented.  Plus hacking other peoples code with mods may break the security &#8211; even though its a secure tracker does not mean it will stay that way if I mod it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctrtard</title>
		<link>http://www.brewsterware.com/more-tracker-thoughts.html/comment-page-1#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>ctrtard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewsterware.com/?p=189#comment-954</guid>
		<description>Your tracker sounds like it&#039;s interesting. But doesn&#039;t it make more sense to build on prosper202?  I mean it&#039;s proven, secure, and works pretty good.   It seems to me if you mod on top of that, the entire engine would be already done.  The rest is pretty easy.  You could even branch it (I think) based on the open source license.  Anyway.... I&#039;ll keep watching to see how this shapes up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your tracker sounds like it&#8217;s interesting. But doesn&#8217;t it make more sense to build on prosper202?  I mean it&#8217;s proven, secure, and works pretty good.   It seems to me if you mod on top of that, the entire engine would be already done.  The rest is pretty easy.  You could even branch it (I think) based on the open source license.  Anyway&#8230;. I&#8217;ll keep watching to see how this shapes up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arif</title>
		<link>http://www.brewsterware.com/more-tracker-thoughts.html/comment-page-1#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Arif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewsterware.com/?p=189#comment-953</guid>
		<description>This is a interesting project as I have a ton of frustrations with finding a tracker that does it all for me. If your tracker can combine functions from PPV Dominator, Prosper202 and tracking 202 pro then youll surely have a ultimate tracker.

A major downfall of most trackers is that they dont handle LP rotations well which PPVD does really well and it also dont allow creation/use of tokens like PPVD and LPGen. I definitly would then want to see 202s automatic account syncing with the PPC, PPV, and Social Adnetworks. All of this mixed with being able to track double conversions on 1 subid and seamless reporting of revenue and cost would really kick most trackers behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a interesting project as I have a ton of frustrations with finding a tracker that does it all for me. If your tracker can combine functions from PPV Dominator, Prosper202 and tracking 202 pro then youll surely have a ultimate tracker.</p>
<p>A major downfall of most trackers is that they dont handle LP rotations well which PPVD does really well and it also dont allow creation/use of tokens like PPVD and LPGen. I definitly would then want to see 202s automatic account syncing with the PPC, PPV, and Social Adnetworks. All of this mixed with being able to track double conversions on 1 subid and seamless reporting of revenue and cost would really kick most trackers behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
